3 ms·
This is true. I was being brash. Let me say instead that the split in reasoning and evaluation as it exists on macOS in this area is rough and potentially not n
by selridge 8mo ago
This is true. I was being brash. Let me say instead that the split in reasoning and evaluation as it exists on macOS in this area is rough and potentially not needed. Granted, I don't have a better answer in my back pocket, and the fact that Apple has kicked the can for 15 years on trying to harmonize these is a sign it's hard.
- VogonPoetry 8mo agoDoes this mean you tried to ship an App in the Apple App Store but could not because of some restriction?
- selridge 8mo agoWhy would it mean that?
- VogonPoetry 8mo agoI took the "granularity doesn't cut it" comment to mean there aren't enough entitlements to eliminate the need for custom SBPL. Followed by a sentence about apps that have temporary exception SBPL. Combining the two seems to imply that if there were more entitlements the custom SBPL might not be necessary. In the followup you noted; the split in reasoning and evaluation is rough and potentially not needed. I read this as a conclusion of wanting to do something, but could not as there were not enough entitlements to make it work, so custom SBPL would be necessary.