3 ms·
Here is the data on a linear, rather than logarithmic scale[0]. Y axis is number of articles and X axis is "years since 2001". I copied the data as best I could
by benmanns 14y ago
Here is the data on a linear, rather than logarithmic scale[0]. Y axis is number of articles and X axis is "years since 2001". I copied the data as best I could from the chart given by the author of this article. Wikipedia has a page itself about its own size which shows a similar linear growth rate[1].
[0] http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=plot+%7B20%2C15000%2C100000%2C200000%2C500000%2C900000%2C1500000%2C2000000%2C2500000%2C3000000%2C3500000%2C4000000%7D http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=plot+%7B20%2C15000%2C10...
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Size_of_Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Size_of_Wikipedia
- ygra 14y agoThat's what I wondered too. It's easy to "show" a certain "saturation" when using a log scale and that only means it doesn't grow relative to its current size.