3 ms·
The reason many languages prefer `length` to `count`, I think, is that the former is clearly a noun and the latter could be a verb. `length` feels like a simple
by pansa2 8mo ago
The reason many languages prefer `length` to `count`, I think, is that the former is clearly a noun and the latter could be a verb. `length` feels like a simple property of a container whereas `count` could be an algorithm.
`countof` removes the verb possibility - but that means that a preference for `countof` over `lengthof` isn't necessarily a preference for `count` over `length`.
- ncruces 8mo agoBut count is more clearly a dimensionless number of elements, and not a size measured in some unit (e.g. bytes).
- deleted 8mo ago[deleted]
- layer8 8mo agoI tend to use numFoos (short for “number of foos”), and only use fooCount when the variable is used for actual counting (like an errorCount variable that is incremented for each error). Countof is strange, because one doesn’t talk about the “count of something” in English, other than uses like “on the count of three” (or the “count of Monte Cristo” ;)).