3 ms·
I agree. I'm not suggesting that it's the only way, but a suitable and generally successful way. Erlang is ok, but the staff don't scale. Have you tried findin
by meaty 14y ago
I agree. I'm not suggesting that it's the only way, but a suitable and generally successful way.
Erlang is ok, but the staff don't scale. Have you tried finding Erlang programmers?
- eternalban 14y ago> [Erlang] doesn't scale. http://basho.com/products/riak-overview/ http://basho.com/products/riak-overview/ I think you mean Erlang's strict CSP -- share nothing -- is not as efficient as shared memory systems such as Go. That is a fact and by design it is a feature and not a bug. Nine 9s: http://pragprog.com/articles/erlang http://pragprog.com/articles/erlang > Have you tried finding Erlang programmers? Go looks easy but it is a subtle language. Brad F. writes a server and it performs. Mr. X writes one and it crawls. Go figure.
- meaty 14y agoErlang doesn't scale as in Erlang doesn't scale to larger projects when you require lots of people working on them. I doubt we could put our 2MLOC trading platform into Erlang and get away with it. It certainly scales from a technology point of view. Go is simple enough to allow Mr X's code to go through a review by Brad F until Mr X gets the point.