4 ms·
I agree that they should provide optionally new versions of LibreOffice, Gimp, and similar software for LTS releases. But I think it's highly unrealistic that t
by fafner 14y ago
I agree that they should provide optionally new versions of LibreOffice, Gimp, and similar software for LTS releases. But I think it's highly unrealistic that this will include more than a few selected software packages. It takes probably quite some effort because Linux software is not only constantly changing but so are the dependencies. At some point it simply is not possible to use new software with an old plumbing. E.g. some package might depend on a newer version of gnome-libs which depend on a new version of something in the plumbing layer.
As far as I see it the non-LTS releases are just the beta tests for the next LTS release. But somehow Canonical does not seem to fully agree with that. If I remember correctly the biggest issue with PA was that it was introduced in an LTS release. They should have probably waited one release and use the 4 releases to get it right.
btw. PPAs and backports can help you if you want new versions in older releases.
- takluyver 14y agoActually, they're moving towards having many more applications updated and added for stable releases. Ubuntu's developer portal now has a system where developers can upload their own apps to the software centre, separately from the Ubuntu release cycle. It's still a work in progress, though - they've had some trouble scaling it up. Traditionally, distributions have been responsible for packaging 'upstream' software, which quickly becomes a bottleneck as more software is created. The key is getting developers to do the packaging themselves, aided by automated systems.