This one IIRC: https://samkriss.substack.com/p/the-law-that-can-be-named-is-not https://samkriss.substack.com/p/the-law-that-can-be-named-is... He writes about

This one IIRC: https://samkriss.substack.com/p/the-law-that-can-be-named-is-not https://samkriss.substack.com/p/the-law-that-can-be-named-is... He writes about it here, a little: https://samkriss.substack.com/p/against-truth https://samkriss.substack.com/p/against-truth In general long meandering semi-factual pieces like this, with odd historical excursions, are one of his things and I don't know anyone else that does it quite the same. (Hmm... oddly enough Scott Alexander, who he cites here, also does some similarly Borgesian stuff, but with a different bent.) One of my favorite writers and I recommend pretty much everything he's done since the early 2010s.