3 ms·
> Not long before I arrived in the Bay Area, I’d been involved in a minor but intense dispute with the rationalist community over a piece of fiction I’d written
by advisedwang 8mo ago
> Not long before I arrived in the Bay Area, I’d been involved in a minor but intense dispute with the rationalist community over a piece of fiction I’d written that I’d failed to properly label as fiction
Anyone familiar with what work this is referring to?
- devinplatt 8mo agoSounds self-referencial
- _dwt 8mo agoThis one IIRC: https://samkriss.substack.com/p/the-law-that-can-be-named-is-not https://samkriss.substack.com/p/the-law-that-can-be-named-is... He writes about it here, a little: https://samkriss.substack.com/p/against-truth https://samkriss.substack.com/p/against-truth In general long meandering semi-factual pieces like this, with odd historical excursions, are one of his things and I don't know anyone else that does it quite the same. (Hmm... oddly enough Scott Alexander, who he cites here, also does some similarly Borgesian stuff, but with a different bent.) One of my favorite writers and I recommend pretty much everything he's done since the early 2010s.
- ianmcgowan 8mo agoProbably the burning man essay, which is one of the best things I've ever read online. https://open.substack.com/pub/samkriss/p/numb-at-burning-man https://open.substack.com/pub/samkriss/p/numb-at-burning-man
- eigencoder 8mo agoI think it's this one: https://samkriss.substack.com/p/the-law-that-can-be-named-is-not https://samkriss.substack.com/p/the-law-that-can-be-named-is... But in general, Sam Kriss tends to weave fiction and nonfiction together in his writing.