3 ms·
Does anyone here actually use the GNU info documentation?
by jrmg 8mo ago
Does anyone here actually use the GNU info documentation?
- kevin_thibedeau 8mo agoI occasionally use gnu info. My favorite tool is pinfo which has a man mode that adds navigable links to cross references in man pages and can shell out to hyperlinks. I usually have that aliased as man.
- krunck 8mo agoJust installed pinfo. Nice. Thanks!
- ho_schi 8mo agoNo. Every man page is better, concise, easy to access. GNU Info should be like a browser but it makes something simple into something complicated.
- teddyh 8mo agoI use it all the time, preferring it to everything else¹. Especially when reading the Python documentation. 1. <https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44213303 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44213303>
- jrmg 8mo agoI’m sorry people are downvoting you for just replying to my question!
- scoops_ 8mo agoThis sounds interesting, how are you getting python docs in the `texinfo` format? I’ve used zeal a fair amount or *.read the docs.io, but always looking for local alternatives. A quick search online didn’t have much info
- teddyh 8mo agoI said “Info”, not “Texinfo”. But you can build Info files from Texinfo. apt install python3-sphinx apt-get source python3.13-doc cd python3.13-3.13.5/Doc make texinfo cd build/texinfo make info
- SoftTalker 8mo agoNo. I have no idea how it works, it's like being a new user in vi and not knowing how to quit.
- fanf2 8mo ago`info foo | less` is a better info reader than `info foo`
- advisedwang 8mo agoI use the online versions, e.g. https://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/html_node/index.html https://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/html_node/index.htm.... In this form they are pretty good documentation (although that is usually due to being comprehensive and adequately written, nothing really to do with info beyond supporting adequate structure).
- mook 8mo agoI use it in particular for bash, mostly because it has better expositions for parameter expansions. To the point that I know searching for "%%" in particular will get me to the correct section. For everything else… I think it's also necessary for GNU find expressions?