Author compares X to Y and then goes: - Y has been successful in the past - Y brought this and this number of metrics, completely unrelated to X field - over

Author compares X to Y and then goes: - Y has been successful in the past - Y brought this and this number of metrics, completely unrelated to X field - overall, Y was cool, therefore, X is good for us! .. I'd say, please bring more arguments why X is equivalent to Y in the first place.