77.500 channels which make any money. Now plenty of those make a handful of dollars per month. Also, 77k worldwide. I am not going to deny that YouTube (and a

77.500 channels which make any money. Now plenty of those make a handful of dollars per month. Also, 77k worldwide. I am not going to deny that YouTube (and all social media) created new markets. But how is this not an argument that shows that when N people suddenly do some activity, only a tiny minority is successful and gains some market share? If tomorrow a product that is made by 3 companies will see competitors by 10000 1-man operations, maybe you will have 30 different successful products, or 100. 9900 of those 10000 will still be out of luck. I YouTube is not an example of a market that being exposed to a flood of players gets shares somewhat equally between those players or that allows a significant number of the to survive with it. Nor is twitch or any of the other platforms.