> Motors and power electrics are now reasonably priced, especially if you're making an actual working truck that doesn't need to do 60 mph in 3 seconds. If you

> Motors and power electrics are now reasonably priced, especially if you're making an actual working truck that doesn't need to do 60 mph in 3 seconds. If you're making an actual working truck, the motor and power electronics need to be more substantial because they have to handle being able to e.g. pull a loaded trailer up a steep grade. > The frame and body are cheap. The piece of metal is fairly cheap. Now fill every door with power electronics, add glass, add climate control, the thing's going to need tires, wheels, axles, brakes, something to make power brakes work without an engine to provide vacuum, steering, suspension, etc. Most of the cost of a vehicle isn't the powertrain. > So a decent $40k truck is definitely possible now. It's not a question of if you can do $40k. It's a question of, does the electric powertrain and battery still cost more than the ICE power train, and therefore require you to cut something else in order to avoid charging more? $30k trucks exist but people don't want a $30k truck for $40k. > I figure that the US automakers instead decided to wall off the competition for as long as possible to wring out every last drop of profit. The obvious problem with this is that they could keep out BYD and hypothetically kick out Nissan and VW etc., but what are Ford and GM supposed to do as the battery prices come down when Tesla just sets the prices of their existing lineup consistent with the falling battery costs, much less releases any new models?