3 ms·
It's kind of ironic given how much USA is censoring content based on their interest.
by tachyons 8mo ago
It's kind of ironic given how much USA is censoring content based on their interest.
- andsoitis 8mo ago> It's kind of ironic given how much USA is censoring content based on their interest. What’s a good example?
- mjmsmith 8mo agoTikTok.
- andsoitis 8mo ago> TikTok. Case that it's not censorship: it is not about what content TikTok shows, it's about who owns the algorithm and data. Forcing a sale to a US owner keeps the platform available while removing a (perceived) national security risk. The government isn't suppressing any particular speech. Case it is censorship: forcing the sale of a platform used by 10s of millions of Americans does affect speech of both creators and viewers. The government is making a structural intervention in a speech platform based partly on the potential for future manipulation. The argument that some would use is that it is more accurately framed as economic nationalism or geopolitical competition dressed in free speech clothing. Others see it as a legitimate national security risk with acceptable free speech tradeoffs.
- _HMCB_ 8mo agoSee yesterday’s FCC hearing before congress. It’s hypocritical for the US to be doing the exact opposite of what they’re doing at home.
- petcat 8mo agoWhich content is being censored?