Interesting point. The quote appears to be the defense attorney's interpretation of the judge's statements. https://scnr.com/article/hobby-gunsmith-in-nyc-conv

Interesting point. The quote appears to be the defense attorney's interpretation of the judge's statements. https://scnr.com/article/hobby-gunsmith-in-nyc-convicted-after-judge-declares-second-amendment-doesnt-exist-in-her-courtroom_bf9095fc012f11ef9c930242ac1c0002 https://scnr.com/article/hobby-gunsmith-in-nyc-convicted-aft... IMO, it depends on the events in court; if there was extensive argumentation about that and the judge is finally saying that it's been discussed to death and there's no point bringing it up, that seems fine. (I don't want to read the actual court transcripts to figure out what the attorney is referring to, so this comment is intentionally inconclusive.)