4 ms·
Did you even care to run it in a reasoning model? It returns the correct result. Every few weeks I see the same thing. Come up with an example that trips up C
by simianwords 9mo ago
Did you even care to run it in a reasoning model? It returns the correct result.
Every few weeks I see the same thing.
Come up with an example that trips up ChatGPT.
- autoexec 9mo agoI didn't try it, but others did. With ChatGPT https://preview.redd.it/2jzzt66r5rjg1.png?width=1346&format=png&auto=webp&s=265c5b6fc40dae86a08a7b417caa6371590f171f https://preview.redd.it/2jzzt66r5rjg1.png?width=1346&format=...
- simianwords 9mo agohttps://chatgpt.com/share/69979cf0-3908-800b-8144-87c2667075d5 https://chatgpt.com/share/69979cf0-3908-800b-8144-87c2667075... no you can't reproduce it using the thinking model. I don't trust random redditor's since its easy to spoof it. Try it yourself. In fact give it 100 tries and post here if you find even one. If your answer is that OpenAI is constantly patching these, then that's conspiracy level thinking. But if you really want to go there, then it should be easy to come up with a new prompt to stump chatgpt wouldn't it?