5 ms·
>Every system can be reduced to its parts and made to sound trivial thereby But the trivialization does not come from being reduced to parts, but what parts yo
by qsera 8mo ago
>Every system can be reduced to its parts and made to sound trivial thereby
But the trivialization does not come from being reduced to parts, but what parts you end up with.
It is like realizing the toy that seems to be able figure out a path around obstacles, cannot actually "see", but works by a clever arrangement of gears.
- simianwords 8mo ago>It is like realizing the toy that seems to be able figure out a path around obstacles, cannot actually see, but works by a clever arrangement of gears. in this case can you come up with things that the toy can't do but a toy with eyes could have?
- ambicapter 8mo agoYes? When you reverse-engineer a machine, it's obviously much easier to draw up an edge case it can't handle.
- simianwords 8mo agoCan you draw up an edge case for LLMs?
- ambicapter 8mo agoHow many r's there are in strawberry was one for a while.
- qsera 8mo agocan't you?
- simianwords 8mo agocan you do that for llms?
- qsera 8mo agocan't you?
- simianwords 8mo agoi posted a challenge, and no one found an edge case
- qsera 8mo agoWhy don't you try asking an llm?
- simianwords 8mo agoit simply says the gap is not there and that LLM's can do better in analytical places. you've asked me 4 times now, can you tell me what an LLM can't do that a human can? whats the edge case?
- qsera 8mo ago>can do better in analytical places. There is your answer.
- simianwords 8mo agoIt can do better than us is what it said lol.
- qsera 8mo agospeak for yourself.
- simianwords 8mo agoyou asked me to ask gpt and i gave you the answer. you have overall exhibited strange behaviour and not engaging in good discussion. if you can find an edge case for an LLM, tell me. i think you genuinely can't find it and saving face.