4 ms·
Yeah, sorry, typo. Still they institutionalise getters, which is the opposite of what their argument was.
by happymellon 8mo ago
Yeah, sorry, typo.
Still they institutionalise getters, which is the opposite of what their argument was.
- tadfisher 8mo agoWell, they don't have "getters" either, they have accessors; x() instead of getX(). It's still bad, but at least it doesn't enforce JavaBeans conventions, which is where getters and setters actually originate [0]. 0: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JavaBeans https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JavaBeans