> But this case is apparently about copyright, and hardware isn't usually subject to copyright. Though I suppose firmware, etc. might be. There's no might, her

> But this case is apparently about copyright, and hardware isn't usually subject to copyright. Though I suppose firmware, etc. might be. There's no might, here. The firmware, OS, hell, even the branding text on a label is subject to copyright. See, for instance, the ruling in Omega v Costco, where a logo was enough to bring copyright infringement charges against Costco for importing foreign-market watches.