4 ms·
Reproduce it. Sit in a clean room and write it all out. Then go check your accuracy. I'm curious to see what it is.
by themafia 8mo ago
Reproduce it. Sit in a clean room and write it all out. Then go check your accuracy. I'm curious to see what it is.
- fc417fc802 8mo agoWhat does this (thought) experiment accomplish? That is, what point are you trying to make here? Since we're talking about an electronic system the search index example is the more directly relevant one. Anyone who wants to object to LLMs is going to need to take care to ensure consistency with his views on Google's search index.
- themafia 8mo agoI wasn't aware I could read 95% of Harry Potter through constructed queries using Google's search index. Can you demonstrate how I might do this? Also can you point out how copyright law changes because we're using an "electronic system" as opposed to an "analog system?"
- fc417fc802 8mo agoYou could do the equivalent if they would let you. They don't. That's the point I was getting at. How the thing is used is what actually matters, not that it has "absorbed" copyrighted material. I never claimed any change in copyright law. Only that one analogy was more direct than the other for the purpose of the current discussion. You didn't answer my question. What point were you trying to make with your earlier reply?