4 ms·
Regulate now. You would think it actually levels the playing field for everyone. Never got this, nor the bizarre dysfunctional pockets on womens clothes. In w
by ggm 8mo ago
Regulate now. You would think it actually levels the playing field for everyone.
Never got this, nor the bizarre dysfunctional pockets on womens clothes.
In wartime/rationing, the government stipulated hem size, banned turn-ups, oxford bags, specified jacket lengths, cloth weights. For working class people, clothes IMPROVED. (de-mob (de-mobilisation) suits were for some working men the best suit of clothes they had ever owned)
- frm88 8mo ago... nor the bizarre dysfunctional pockets on womens clothes. That clearly has the function to sell purses and it works very well - even in this thread a commenter is writing (paraphrased): I'd rather wear something cute and use a purse... The accessory market in the U.S. is worth $ 798 billion so nobody is keen to subtract from that by sewing on functional pockets. https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/fashion-accessories-market-report https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/fashion-...