> My point is that you misread the comment you replied to. I'm not the person you replied to. > (By the way, on page 2 of the paper: "we evaluate each LLM onl

> My point is that you misread the comment you replied to. I'm not the person you replied to. > (By the way, on page 2 of the paper: "we evaluate each LLM only within its corresponding harness.") That has zero relevance to my comment or to the type of harnesses I talked about in the comment you replied to, nor in my comment up-thread.