2 ms·
I think that's because not everyone does the same job within the same stack and constraints. I'm yet to find an LLM that writes the kind of C++ I dabble with wi
by qalmakka 8mo ago
I think that's because not everyone does the same job within the same stack and constraints. I'm yet to find an LLM that writes the kind of C++ I dabble with without having to manually tweak it myself (or that truly understands our codebase). Conversely, I find that LLMs are now excellent at python and orchestration tasks for instance. It's very situational
- 1broseidon 8mo ago100% - you are very right. 4.6 is amazing for orchestration. I even built some tools around agent to agent contracting. I use 4.6 as the brain and then handoff to a more rigid llm like GPT 5.2 or Opus 4.5