3 ms·

I won't argue with you on the project-related part of it, you obviously know best there :) Thank you for all the work! But how would you "rate" for example des

by gf000 8mo ago

I won't argue with you on the project-related part of it, you obviously know best there :) Thank you for all the work! But how would you "rate" for example desktop "GNU/Linux" with this in mind? Quite clearly privacy is important here and none of the major components leak/store unnecessary personal data. But the security story is quite sad, everything runs as the same user so a random `npm install` can just do whatever it wants with my browser caches, ssh keys, etc. I would say that GNU/Linux is privacy-friendly, but has terrible security. Would you not agree here? How does this fit with the "privacy and security are not separate things" part? Genuinely curious about your opinion here, not arguing for the sake of it, they are just not as closely connected in my mind. For example Google has a good track record of having safe practices regarding data storage -- but privacy is not their strong suit/hard to define what it means for a company to begin with.

strcat 8mo ago
> Quite clearly privacy is important It's seriously lacking. There's little work on it. Applications are largely fully trusted with lack of a modern permission model. > none of the major components leak/store unnecessary personal data Many components have privacy issues and have privacy invasive services. > I would say that GNU/Linux is privacy-friendly, but has terrible security. Disagree with an OS which has poor privacy protections against applications and services along with overall lack of systemic work on privacy being privacy friendly. Android Open Source Project without our privacy improvements is more privacy friendly than desktop Linux. There's not much privacy when nearly everything has access to everything and developers do all kinds of things which are bad for privacy. They may not be trying to gather user data but that doesn't mean the services quietly used by many applications are privacy friendly.

by gf000 8mo ago

strcat 8mo ago

> Quite clearly privacy is important It's seriously lacking. There's little work on it. Applications are largely fully trusted with lack of a modern permission model. > none of the major components leak/store unnecessary personal data Many components have privacy issues and have privacy invasive services. > I would say that GNU/Linux is privacy-friendly, but has terrible security. Disagree with an OS which has poor privacy protections against applications and services along with overall lack of systemic work on privacy being privacy friendly. Android Open Source Project without our privacy improvements is more privacy friendly than desktop Linux. There's not much privacy when nearly everything has access to everything and developers do all kinds of things which are bad for privacy. They may not be trying to gather user data but that doesn't mean the services quietly used by many applications are privacy friendly.