3 ms·
Surely they could hire some good lawyers if that means they make billions upon billions? AFAIK there's nothing illegal about creating compatibility layers. Othe
by colordrops 8mo ago
Surely they could hire some good lawyers if that means they make billions upon billions? AFAIK there's nothing illegal about creating compatibility layers. Otherwise WINE would have shut down long ago.
- M95D 8mo agoDepends on what code they wrote. If they used LLMs to write it, it could contain proprietary nvidia parts. Someone would then have to review that, but can't, because maybe the nvidia code that came from the LLM isn't even public. So the strategy to publish independently, wait and see if nvidia lawyers have anything to say about it, would be a very smart move.
- ddtaylor 8mo agoThe Oracle case was about the stubs of the API being considered copyrighted I believe. The argument wasn't that Google used any of their code, it was that by using the same functional names they were making a thought crime.
- zvr 8mo agoThe last time something similar happened (Google vs Oracle), the legal battles lasted more than a decade. It would be a very bold decision by ARM to commit to this strategy (implement "CUDA" and fight it out in courts).
- gzread 8mo agoThat means Google got to use Java for a decade. A decade-long legal battle is great news for whoever seems to be in the wrong, as long as they can still afford lawyers. Remember, they don't claw back dividends or anything.