3 ms·
> but we still wouldn't say the sentence is false. Yes "we" do. It's false. It's false not because it's a lie but because it's very poorly worded and under s
by themafia 8mo ago
> but we still wouldn't say the sentence is false.
Yes "we" do. It's false. It's false not because it's a lie but because it's very poorly worded and under specified. Inside of a work attempting to communicate a highly specific idea it's a genuine mistake. It invites ambiguity and misunderstanding.
> 99.9% of people
Good for them. What's the point here? Are you attempting to bully me by suggesting I'm not part of your crowd?
> in the spirit in which it was written.
Uh huh. And what spirit are you writing in?
- stavros 8mo agoI was attempting to say you're uselessly pedantic, but apparently subtlety didn't work.
- themafia 8mo agoTake your judgement somewhere else. No one asked for them. You're being rude, bullying, and arrogant. Which is worse than "useless." I would rather, all day, deal with "useless pedantry" than deal with your kind of attitude. You are the worse type of person that vistis hacker news. Perhaps a different forum would suit your, uh, "needs," a little better.
- stavros 8mo agoThat's a coincidence, I thought the exact same of you.