> The students aren’t exactly cheating and if they are, can you blame them? I don't understand this logic. Many of these students are telling lies and manipula

> The students aren’t exactly cheating and if they are, can you blame them? I don't understand this logic. Many of these students are telling lies and manipulating to get a benefit that wasn't designed for them. In many cases (such as housing priority selection) they're actively taking spots from students with genuine needs. How do you arrive at a conclusion that this isn't cheating? And why can't we blame them for their own decisions and actions? The university isn't forcing them to do this. > when extra test time can boost your grade point average, opting out feels like self-sabotage. Cheating on exams can also boost your grade point average. I find these attempts to shift blame to anyone but the people making the decisions to be illogical. Let's call it what it is: Many of these students found a way to lie and cheat for personal gain with low or zero chance of getting caught, so they're choosing to do it. It's their choice, though.