3 ms·
What are you talking about? I haven't said anything against capitalism. If anything, the problem with the current scenario is that there's not _enough_ capitali
by quacked 8mo ago
What are you talking about? I haven't said anything against capitalism. If anything, the problem with the current scenario is that there's not _enough_ capitalism.
How do you propose to compete with foreign workers when the government prevents you from matching their employment conditions within your own company?
- donkeybeer 8mo agoYou said you'd be happier with much more expensive goods which is what happens with protectionism and were sad to compete with foreign goods.
- quacked 8mo agoI'd be fine with either: - The massive regulatory burdens on American businesses are dissolved in order to permit genuine competition with the globe - Economic protectionism is applied so that the heavily regulated American business can compete on price with less-regulated foreign businesses In both cases, the prices of goods would increase--in the first case, less than the second. But both would be better than the current status quo, in my opinion. I don't want to live in a country where I have to pay American prices for goods and services, but the owner class only has to pay foreign prices for labor and supply. I have no desire to be outcompeted by foreigners while my hands are tied by local laws.