4 ms·
If you've been using each new step is very noticeable and so have the mindshare. Around Sonnet 3.7 Claude Code-style coding became usable, and very quickly gain
by dtech 8mo ago
If you've been using each new step is very noticeable and so have the mindshare. Around Sonnet 3.7 Claude Code-style coding became usable, and very quickly gained a lot of marketshare. Opus 4 could tackle significant more complexity. Opus 4.6 has been another noticable step up for me, suddenly I can let CC run significantly more independently, allowing multiple parallel agents where previously too much babysitting was required for that.
- IanCal 8mo agoI think this is where there's a huge distinction between ability/performance/benchmark figures and utility. You can have smooth improvements to performance, but marked step changes in utility as they cross thresholds where you're able to use them for new tasks.
- littlestymaar 8mo ago> If you've been using each new step is very noticeable and so have the mindshare. Around Sonnet 3.7 Claude Code-style coding became usable Yet I vividly remember the complaints about how 3.7 was a regression compared to 3.5 with people advising to stay on 3.5. Conversely, Sonnet 4 was well received so it's not just a story about how complainers make the most noise.