4 ms·
Right... So how much CSAM is an acceptable amount of CSAM in your opinion then?
by dtj1123 8mo ago
Right... So how much CSAM is an acceptable amount of CSAM in your opinion then?
- zb3 8mo agoWho was abused here?
- chrystalkey 8mo agoThe people used as template faces and bodies
- deleted 8mo ago[deleted]
- autoexec 8mo agoThe environment.
- riotnrrd 8mo agoWhen you post on a public forum defending child pornography, it's maybe a good time to take a step back and evaluate your life.
- JasonADrury 8mo agoWhat a vile accusation for you to make based on zero substance. Perhaps it is you who needs to take a step back and evaluate your life.
- kakali 8mo agoThe future victims when the imagery stops being enough.
- zb3 8mo agoHas this been studied? I'm not following the topic, but without any evidence one could also say that availability of fake imagery might decrease demand for real imagery and therefore decrease the amount of abuse. But I'm not implying anything, just asking.
- LorenPechtel 8mo agoA couple of things come to mind: 1) Zero is basically never the best error rate, effort isn't infinite and spending too much of it on one defect ends up meaning spending less on other issues. 2) Look at what he's saying. This is a classic pattern for providing a fake proof of evil. a) Point to evil. For example, CSAM b) Expand the definition of that evil in ways that are often not even evil. Here, include scantily clad in your definition of "sexual". Note that swimsuits qualify. c) Point to examples of evil in your expanded pool. d) Claim this points to evidence of the original definition. Note that nothing about their claims precludes their "CSAM" being nothing more than ordinary beach or pool scenes. Their claim includes the null and when the null is a possible answer it should be assumed.
- LocalH 8mo agoTo your point 2b, I would posit that it is also evil to sexualize adults against their consent
- dtj1123 8mo agoI've asked how much lower the error rate should be in order to be acceptable, and you've then replied with a rebuttal to the message of the posted article. I agree that a zero error rate is generally not possible, although I think a company like Xitter can manage better than 101 in 20k.