> shame to anyone defending this abuse as some sort of pro immigration policy. In what way is it not pro-immigration? Perhaps you mean "pro-immigrant"? In that

> shame to anyone defending this abuse as some sort of pro immigration policy. In what way is it not pro-immigration? Perhaps you mean "pro-immigrant"? In that case, your view is cogent, but I guess this just exposes that pro-immigration policy isn't necessarily good for the immigrants that it welcomes. Immigration benefits capital. For example, as Federal Reserve Vice Chair Bowman indicated [0], immigration creates housing inflation. [0] https://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/speech/bowman20260116a.htm https://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/speech/bowman20260...