2 ms·
> I'm arguing that science is great because it produces better output than the people that make it as long as they stick to good methods. I don’t think we have
by reliabilityguy 8mo ago
> I'm arguing that science is great because it produces better output than the people that make it as long as they stick to good methods.
I don’t think we have a contradiction here. What I am saying is that science is made by people, and we as scientists have to be extremely vigilant today not to let “ends justify the means” crowd to use the name of science for their own agenda.
- biophysboy 8mo agoYeah I might be nitpicking. I agree with you. I get frustrated when people conflate a neutral scientific method with a neutral scientist: that a scientist cannot explore political/ideological topics with robust methods because its biased. Do you see the sleight of hand I'm talking about? I've noticed it a lot in the reproducibility discourse.
- reliabilityguy 8mo ago> Do you see the sleight of hand I'm talking about? Yes. I have sociologists in my extended friends group, and we had a couple of heated discussions on why interviewing 20 subjects is not sufficient for the conclusions they have. But, turns out, it’s the norm in their specific field. Go figure