4 ms·
/e/OS/ was bad with updates for a long time (I had to switch 2022). IodéOS is very good at it, in my experience (I have used all three)
by lejalv 8mo ago
/e/OS/ was bad with updates for a long time (I had to switch 2022). IodéOS is very good at it, in my experience (I have used all three)
- palata 8mo ago> /e/OS/ was bad with updates for a long time (I had to switch 2022). In my case, it was a few months ago, so end of 2025. I think it's just that they can't possibly support thousands of Android devices. I just don't like that they are not being very clear about it. You would think that buying a phone through Murena would guarantee some kind of support, but it actually doesn't.
- strcat 8mo agoiodéOS lags far behind on Android, Linux kernel, browser engine and other updates too. It's much less behind than /e/ and misleads users less but they still do. They set an inaccurate Android security patch level which misleads users just as /e/ does.
- lejalv 8mo agoI didn't know. Do you have a link to one specific announcement where they mislead people about the patch level? It would help to start a conversation to change that.
- strcat 8mo agoThe patch level they set in the operating system is consistently inaccurate. They raise the patch level based on applying a subset of the AOSP patches without the full set of patches including being missing kernel, driver and firmware patches.