4 ms·
To me it looks almost like that. I would say that the first "catchy" post (or maybe first catchy reply) tends (TENDS) to set the tone. No, I doubt that the eff
by CalmQuiet 18y ago
To me it looks almost like that. I would say that the first "catchy" post (or maybe first catchy reply) tends (TENDS) to set the tone. No, I doubt that the effect is intended, but it seems inevitable: a snowballing effect can occur only around a sufficiently potent idea that gets injected.
Of course, this phenomenon can have the the effect of derailing the central idea (perhaps your initial concern?), but may we conclude, "There are no perfect discussion, only great ones?"
Related thought: I've often wondered whether a pop-up summary of the essence of the originally posted article that is linked would help focus discussion + (for new news) help visitors know whether the linked material is worth their visiting. [ For me, often the discussion on YHN is worth 10x what the linked article was. ]
- alabut 18y agoUnfortunately I find it's not quite as simple as the first snappy or good idea snowballing into the top comment - I've often noticed a good long chain of replies and discussion get bumped down simply because of the high karma points of the poster of a top level comment. The upside of that is that people with higher karma get their voice heard more easily, which (hopefully) encourages people to slowly build up karma by contributing good links or comments. Yes there's snowballing but also trolls get drowned out quicker.