> Wow, that's a very torturous reading of a specific line in a standard. It's actually a much more torturous reading to say "if any line in the program contain

> Wow, that's a very torturous reading of a specific line in a standard. It's actually a much more torturous reading to say "if any line in the program contains undefined behavior (such as the example given in the standard, integer overflow), then it's OK for the compiler to treat the entire program as garbage and create any behavior whatsoever in the executable." Which is exactly what had been claimed, that he was addressing.