3 ms·
That’s not my requirement, that’s SQLite’s requirement. If you want to dispute their claim, I recommend you write to them, however I strongly suspect they know
by scott_w 8mo ago
That’s not my requirement, that’s SQLite’s requirement. If you want to dispute their claim, I recommend you write to them, however I strongly suspect they know more about this than you do.
- viraptor 8mo agoI know it's on the sqlite side. I'm familiar with the claim and disagree with it.
- scott_w 8mo agoYou’re arguing in this context: > wouldn't the ability to automatically rewrite sqlite in Rust be a valuable asset? If you want to rewrite SQLite, you must accept their position. Otherwise you simply aren’t rewriting SQLite, you’re writing your own database.
- viraptor 8mo agoNot having bound checks does not make sqlite sqlite. If that was the case, you couldn't compile it with https://clang.llvm.org/docs/BoundsSafety.html https://clang.llvm.org/docs/BoundsSafety.html turned on and still call it sqlite for example.