Indeed, sometimes the question is silly and you should not be afriad to question it. I was once asked about video conferencing in detail for some task and expl

Indeed, sometimes the question is silly and you should not be afriad to question it. I was once asked about video conferencing in detail for some task and explained that recording via VCR and sending the output via tape would be more suitable and cost effective for what they were trying to use it for. You have to look at the initial question and peel of the layers until you find the reason for the question and then you can address the true problem. Sometimes somebody will ask how to computerise this and you will ook at it and sometimes find yourself asking how does it work now and again sometimes saying that what they have is already better or as good as a computerised system to that problem. In this cube land question you can answear, how are you defining the centre and just revering that process will already give you the code you require. What they are doing you don't know so you have to ask, may be they are trying to reinvent a wheel and with that the best answear may be how to draw a circle as there question is flawed. This is the problem with made up interview questions, if they are based upon real world experience then you get a good question that you can truely answear. You may have a better answear or approach which with them having lived it, makes enough sence to know you would of saved them 2 days debugging that problem and thats from a quick chat walking of the street. If it is a made up question then your approach and alternative answear can be missed and ignored and your genius is not appreicieated.