3 ms·
And I'm not OK with ONLY Turing occupying this position. Von Neumann, Curry, Kholmogorov, McCartey, Armstrong, Norvig, many others (yes, I'm mixing alive and d
by Ingaz 14y ago
And I'm not OK with ONLY Turing occupying this position.
Von Neumann, Curry, Kholmogorov, McCartey, Armstrong, Norvig, many others (yes, I'm mixing alive and dead) - are they really not standing near Turing?
- saraid216 14y agoYou want to make the same list for civil rights? If you want to evangelize computer science to the masses, then by all means. I applaud that. But I'm not going to do it, and I can't ask someone else to. Turing is not bad enough to be disqualified, so if there's only one and the chips have fallen such that it's him, I'm okay with that.
- philwelch 14y agoBut Einstein is sufficient to represent science? He's not even sufficient to represent physics. BTW, who is McCartey? Did you mean John McCarthy?