This seems like a (counter-)disinfo campaign. Multiple, vague, wild claims without evidence are always extremely sus. If (and it's a very big if) it were true,

This seems like a (counter-)disinfo campaign. Multiple, vague, wild claims without evidence are always extremely sus. If (and it's a very big if) it were true, the presentation of it comes across as extremely false. I'm disappointed slightly, but not all dissidents are created morally or ethically superior.