3 ms·
It's not as if we're letting them decide the law by putting something on their website. We are letting them tell us what their interpretation of the law is. I
by philh 14y ago
It's not as if we're letting them decide the law by putting something on their website. We are letting them tell us what their interpretation of the law is.
I don't know why the lawyer was telling the Supreme Court what the record companies' interpretation of the law was, but it doesn't sound especially nefarious.
- grecy 14y agoI think it's a dangerous precedent to set. i.e. I get dragged into court and say "But the RIAA said it was completely legal on their website". Bad luck.