3 ms·
It's not possible to tell if you're 10x faster, or even faster at all, over any non-trivial amount of time. When not using a coding agent, you make different de
by zibzob 8mo ago
It's not possible to tell if you're 10x faster, or even faster at all, over any non-trivial amount of time. When not using a coding agent, you make different decisions and get the task done differently, at a different level of architecture, with a different understanding of the code.
- AstroBen 8mo agoYou don't think it's possible you'd notice if you, or the people around you, produced 6 months of work in 3 weeks? The case where it's not obvious is when the effect is <1.5x. I think that's clearly where we're at
- zibzob 8mo agoI think it's a lot harder than it sounds. First, nobody can estimate time well enough to know how long something would have taken without AI. And then, it's comparing apples to oranges - there's the set of things people did using an AI agent, and the set of things they would have done if they hadn't used AI, and the two are just not directly comparable. The AI agent set would definitely have more lines of code, that's all I could really say. Maybe it would also contain a larger maintenance burden, lower useful knowledge in humans, projects that didn't need to be done or could have been done in a smarter way, etc.
- coldtea 8mo agoThis sounds like lowering expectations with extra steps!