4 ms·
So, the entire NATO is proud to loose land to Russia slowly?
by sedan_baklazhan 8mo ago
So, the entire NATO is proud to loose land to Russia slowly?
- dh2022 8mo agoNATO is not involved at all. If NATO got involved the conventional war in the Ukraine would be over in less than a year (and maybe a nuclear war would start …)
- sigwinch 8mo agoMoreover, NATO is justified to do whatever it takes to keep Russia from auctioning its stockpile. That means protecting it from internal collapse, not winning too decisively, even benefitting Putin when necessary. With START falling apart, Russia lost a tool that was buying some time.
- sedan_baklazhan 8mo agoNATO is involved by both weapons and money. These are main things that let a war go on. Ukraine's role is a limited and minor one: providing manpower. (NATO also provides some manpower, BTW).
- dh2022 8mo ago‘[weapons and money] these are the main things that let a war go.’ - your reply is not serious. Your reply did not include manpower as the main thing in war.
- sedan_baklazhan 8mo agoManpower is no longer the main thing in war since invention of swords and shields. Money and weapons are crucial.
- wiseowise 8mo ago> Manpower is no longer the main thing in war since invention of swords and shields. Must be true by how much “meat” Soviets and Chinese threw on their occupiers.
- kspacewalk2 8mo agoThe fact that Russia's leadership has the same kind of borderline delusional take on Ukraine and its army is, ironically, a significant reason why Russia's army has been so hilariously bad on the battlefield against Ukrainians, considering the hugely lopsided advantage in resources. I'm all for it, keep it up!
- masterlee_fn 8mo ago[dead]