3 ms·
As a parent, I would want to know everything about anyone who's going to be around my children in any capacity. That doesn't mean I have a right to it, though.
by JadeNB 7mo ago
As a parent, I would want to know everything about anyone who's going to be around my children in any capacity. That doesn't mean I have a right to it, though.
- dirasieb 7mo ago>openly admits his beliefs results in parents not making good decisions on who to allow near their children, keeps going anyway great moral system you have there
- criddell 7mo agoThat's a bad faith take. In one comment you managed to violate a whole bunch of the HN commenting guidelines. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
- dirasieb 7mo agohow else would you interpret admitting you don't think parents should have a right to know the backgrounds of the people with access to their children before making informed decisions on whether or not to allow it? please, show me your good faith interpretation and i will take back my comment
- naasking 7mo agoNobody gets to have unbounded information about others. It's weird that you think there should be no privacy constraints.
- dirasieb 7mo agowhat if these “others” voluntarily apply to a position where they have regular contact and help take care of your children? is it ok then to be informed on whether or not they are a convicted child rapist?
- hdlothia 7mo agoWhy are you saying unbounded when the discussion is about court proceedings and convictions? There is a clear and consistent boundary here, no one is asking for search logs and round the clock surveillance.