4 ms·
At least try a different question with similar logic, to ensure this isn't patched into the context since it's going viral.
by clktmr 8mo ago
At least try a different question with similar logic, to ensure this isn't patched into the context since it's going viral.
- j_maffe 8mo agoYou can't "patch" LLM's in 4 hours and this is not the kind of question to trigger a web search
- nroets 8mo agoYou can pattern match on the prompt (input) then (a) stuff the context with helpful hints to the LLM e.g. "Remember that a car is too heavy for a person to carry" or (b) upgrade to "thinking".
- throwuxiytayq 8mo agoYes, I’m sure that’s what engineers at Google are doing all day. That, and maintaining the moon landing conspiracy.
- anonymous_user9 8mo agoIf they aren't, they should be (for more effective fraud). Devoting a few of their 200,000 employees to make criticisms of LLMs look wrong seems like an effective use of marketing budget.
- deleted 8mo ago[deleted]
- rluna828 8mo agoIt looks like they do. https://simonwillison.net/2025/May/25/claude-4-system-prompt/#notably-removed-since-claude-3-7 https://simonwillison.net/2025/May/25/claude-4-system-prompt... They patch it in the prompt and they eventually address it in the re-enforcement training. It seems the eventual goal is to patch all of these tiny "glitches" so as to hide the lack of cognition.
- londons_explore 8mo agoA tiny bit of fine-tuning would take minutes...
- vimda 8mo agoYou absolutely can, either through the system prompt or by hardcoding overrides in the backend before it even hits the LLM, and I can guarantee that companies like Google are doing both
- tlogan 8mo agoThis has been viral on Tiktok far at least one week. Not really 4 hours.