3 ms·
http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3260639 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3260639
by alayne 14y ago
http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3260639 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3260639
- Groxx 14y ago^ previous submission, ~ 1 year ago, plenty of comments. please include a description or something next time, instead of a bare link. Otherwise it's hard to assess the relevancy without clicking: http://i0.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/000/000/681/what-you-did-there-i-see-it.thumbnail.jpg http://i0.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/000/000/681/wha...
- CKKim 14y agoThis was my first thought when seeing the current submission too. I have no problem with reposts, but one thing I would question is when one provides the date in the title. 2011 is too recent to do so? I don't know, for me that seems borderline. It is not in the guidelines. What do we think? Ought we to have a "[Repost]" tag? Is someone posting a link to the previous submission in the comments sufficient? I think I lean towards the latter, but agree with my sibling that an explanation of the link is preferred.