3 ms·
I'm not arguing for mass surveillance, I'm arguing for keeping surveillance in busy places which as you admit has worked well for decades. I'm against the Ring/
by JCattheATM 8mo ago
I'm not arguing for mass surveillance, I'm arguing for keeping surveillance in busy places which as you admit has worked well for decades. I'm against the Ring/Flock dystopian nightmare as well.
> But do you think your desires are being adhered to?
No, but I think an apathetic population are the problem, and I don't know how to solve it.
- _carbyau_ 8mo agoI think we are largely in agreeance here. It was the thing about "nuances" that bugged me mostly. The nuances determine whether the benefits outweigh the cost. Appropriately managed isolated systems are fine. Dystopian nightmare is not. .. and the apathy might doom us all. Thank you for an interesting thread of conversation.
- JCattheATM 8mo ago> and the apathy might doom us all. That, and the eagerness for misinformation that fits with preconceptions. > Thank you for an interesting thread of conversation. Likewise!