> I think they genuinely want to protect kids, and the privacy destruction is driven by a combination of not caring and not understanding. Advancing a case for

> I think they genuinely want to protect kids, and the privacy destruction is driven by a combination of not caring and not understanding. Advancing a case for a precedent-creating decision is a well-known tactic for creating the environment of success you want for a separate goal. It's possible you can find a genuine belief in the people who advance the cause. Charitably, they're perhaps naive or coincidentally aligned, and uncharitably sometimes useful idiots who are brought in-line directly or indirectly with various powerful donors' causes.