4 ms·
I'm happy that they fixed it, checked for any similar errors, and promised that they would improve their processes to try to prevent it from happening again. T
by skybrian 9mo ago
I'm happy that they fixed it, checked for any similar errors, and promised that they would improve their processes to try to prevent it from happening again.
This is pretty much what I expect when an organization makes a mistake. Many organizations don't do as well.
- Barrin92 9mo agothe apology for the mistake is fine but it is expected journalistic practice to hand an article to a fact checker before it goes out who will quite literally make sure names, dates, quotes and so on are authentic. I thought of Ars Technica as a pretty decent publication, now I am wondering if they actually check what they publish.
- skybrian 9mo agoThe New Yorker famously has separate fact checkers, but I'm not sure how many other news organizations do?
- starkparker 9mo agoAh, the New Yorker. That's a Condé Nast publication too, just like Ars. There have been any labor incidents involving fact checkers and Condé Nast at the New Yorker recently: https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2025/11/21/conde-nast-new-yorker-firings-labor-dispute/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2025/11/21/conde-nas...
- direwolf20 9mo agoStandard practice at most organisations these days is to apologize then keep doing it, it seems