6 ms·
I feel like you accidentally flipped a minus sign in your equations and then doubled down on your conclusions. Who would pay you to take something away and dest
by exe34 8mo ago
I feel like you accidentally flipped a minus sign in your equations and then doubled down on your conclusions. Who would pay you to take something away and destroy it for you?
It's fine to come up with creative solutions using an LLM, but you have to apply some critical thing before throwing your weight behind the conclusions!
- blharr 8mo agoWhat's stopping the price from being extremely low? Plenty might pay $1 to take a bundle of 1000 items of clothing, pick through it and find 20 items they like, then destroy the 980 other items.
- CivBase 8mo agoIsn't that still better than it all getting destroyed? Also if someone is buying new goods for pennies on the dollar, I'd expect them to find some value in more than 2% of the stock.
- blharr 8mo agoExcept being destroyed locally in a controlled or regulated process and shipped to be destroyed overseas with more relaxed regulations are not equal footprint wise
- exe34 8mo agosounds like an improvement on the current system, no?
- blharr 8mo ago980 items being shipped then destroyed versus 1000 items being destroyed. It's 980(x+y) instead of 1000(x) I have no knowledge of the tradeoffs, but I might also imagine that the method of destruction could be worse: incineration vs landfill vs thrown in the ocean, etc