3 ms·
No, that's not at all what I'm suggesting. Walden O'Dell was a top fundraiser for George W. Bush. He also ran the machines that elected him president. He is obv
by cryptoz 14y ago
No, that's not at all what I'm suggesting. Walden O'Dell was a top fundraiser for George W. Bush. He also ran the machines that elected him president. He is obviously legally allowed to do all of this, including having an opinion (though I do not believe it should be legal to raise funds for a candidate and also run the machines that count the votes).
What I'm saying is: Anyone who builds voting machines should not be taking sides. Especially financial sides. It's a clear conflict of interest, where the result is that I cannot possibly trust the machines to do what they say.
The people building them are Republicans. The machines are closed, proprietary devices. They cannot be trusted. Hence, we must assume they are rigged.
- deleted 14y ago[deleted]
- weaksauce 14y agoThe code running these should be on github and the binaries should be cryptographically signed to ensure it's the correct one.
- Retric 14y agoIf you don't trust the hardware the software is useless. Honestly, don't think voting machines should be outsourced period.