2 ms·
The way I read it, GP is saying that the Vatican's influence reduces such unethical distribution of medical information. Your response reads like a rebuttal, bu
by wizzwizz4 8mo ago
The way I read it, GP is saying that the Vatican's influence reduces such unethical distribution of medical information. Your response reads like a rebuttal, but I'm not sure what you're trying to say, nor rebut.
- mistrial9 8mo ago>in most EU countries is that the Vatican still has control over the board of a very surprising number of hospitals. >Needless to say, the EU governments really hate that > if the government wants the Vatican out of the board ... they have to increase spending on that hospital, often by a lot. I'd call them "Vatican hospitals" > one thing government and the Vatican really agree on is that they do not want patients to know the underlying financial arrangements around hospitals > in many cases it's quite difficult to find who controls a hospital even though it's technically public information) I am responding to these somewhat "breathless" statements that imply more than they delineate. My rebuttal is that these words frame a kind of inquiry that is common among conspiracy-attracted commentors. The subject deserves more rigor and less insinuation IMO.