I just tested originality.ai and it claimed 100% probability that the editors note on the Ars retraction [1] was itself AI generated. For the Gemini article on

I just tested originality.ai and it claimed 100% probability that the editors note on the Ars retraction [1] was itself AI generated. For the Gemini article on Benji Edwards it was "only" 56%. I think your tools need a lot more evidence to be considered reliable. 1: https://arstechnica.com/staff/2026/02/editors-note-retraction-of-article-containing-fabricated-quotations/ https://arstechnica.com/staff/2026/02/editors-note-retractio...